Emerging Information Tech

 

This week I would like you to write a 4-page reflective paper on what you have learned so far in this course and how you will be able to apply the lessons learned.

Paper Requirements 

  • 4 pages (including title page, 2 pages of content,  and reference page) 
  • 1 Inch Margins 
  • Running Header
  • 12 pt font
  • double spacing
  • References from the text
  • Use of outside references 

Some questions to consider to help you draft your response 

  • What are the main lessons that have resonated with me?
  • Why did these lessons resonate with me?
  • What concepts were easy to learn and why?
  • What concepts were more challenging to understand and why?
  • How could I use this in now and in the future?
  • What lessons do I have direct experience with and why?

Technology Entrepreneurship

Que 1:  Discuss this statement: “Internationalization is a relevant strategic option for high-tech venture expansion and growth.” What makes this statement true? What facts support this statement? – Almost 1 page

Que 2:  Discuss this statement: “The application of financial theory to new venturing has uniquely defining characteristics that differentiates it from classical corporate finance.” What makes this statement true? What are the defining characteristics? – Almost 1 page

Que 3:  Read the attached case study and write 2 and a half-page summary analysis and answer the Case Study Questions.  

Note: My assignments will need actual references from EBSCO host, google scholar, and semantic scholar With a website link at the end.  Only use APA 7th edition. Que 3 needs to be in separate document. I have also attached APA 7th edition format for your reference. Please review and create the paper accordingly. 

Executive Program Practical Connection Assignment

 

At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong educational programs and courses that allow them to be servant-leaders in their disciplines and communities, linking research with practice and knowledge with ethical decision-making. This assignment is a written assignment where students will demonstrate how this course research has connected and put into practice within their own career. 

Assignment: 
Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, share times when you have or could observe these theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in your field of study. 

Requirements:

  • Provide a 500 word (or 2 pages double spaced) minimum reflection.
  • Use of proper APA formatting and citations. If supporting evidence from outside resources is used those must be properly cited.
  • Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course.
  • Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. If you are not employed, demonstrate a connection to your desired work environment. 
  • You should not, provide an overview of the assignments assigned in the course. The assignment asks that you reflect how the knowledge and skills obtained through meeting course objectives were applied or could be applied in the workplace. 
  • Any use of outside sources, including your own prior work, will result in a zero on the activity and a report being filed with Academic Affairs regarding plagiarism (even if self-plagiarism). 

Course Name:   Enterprise Risk Management 

cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization

Textbook Chapter 9: Cyberbullying, Online Harassment and Cyber Stalking.

1. To what area(s) of which chapter does the work most closely relate?

2. What does(do) the author(s) set forth as their thesis in the piece?

3. What subjects does the work regard: people, entities, industries, political bodies, demographic groups, etc.?

4. What journal was it published in, and when?

5. **Key** How can you apply their work to your academic and professional understanding of DF?

6. What did the author(s) get right? Wrong? How could they have expanded/focused their scope?

· No Plagiarism 

· Should be 400 words without References.