Week 2 Project

 

Instructions

Supporting Lectures:

Review the following lectures:

Project

The project assignment provides a forum for analyzing and evaluating relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

Introduction:

Research the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Labor Organization (ILO) and provide your findings.

Tasks:

  • Analyze China’s admittance into the WTO.
  • Evaluate the pros and cons of the WTO.
  • Analyze the role of the ILO and the impact it has on CSR.
  • Evaluate the pros and cons of the ILO.

To support your work, use your course and text readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite all sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Submission Details:

  • Create a 3- to 4-page document.
  • Name your file as SU_HRM6000_W2_Project_LastName_FirstName.

Communication and Collaboration

 

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

Theresa and Mike understand that building the culture they envision requires effective communication, collaboration, and participative problem solving. They envision creating an organization such that Joe and other employees will know exactly what to do when faced with choices that involve ethics. As the first step in embedding clear ethical processes in the organization, they realize they need to devise a code of conduct. Both companies have operated with an unwritten code that was never formalized. The consultant is asked to help them understand the purpose and content of an excellent code of conduct and how they should go about developing it. 

Review the scenario for this course and answer the following questions:

  • What is the purpose of a code of conduct?
  • Evaluate the code of conduct of Levi Strauss and describe ethical principles it includes.
  • In your own work experience, have you seen similar ethical principles used in organizations and, if so, which ones?

Topic for power point presentation 5

Q:  Be able to explain OSHA laws?

prepare a PowerPoint presentation consisting of 5 slides per student not including the cover slide and the reference slide. Every slide needs to include 100 words in the Notes section. 

You must use at least one reference, in addition to your book. You need to use in-text citations. Your in-text citation and your reference (on your reference slide) must be in APA format.

HRMN Questions

 

Question #1

What is the difference between climate and culture?

No need to respond to colleagues.

Question #2:

What is the difference between using a qualitative approach to studying culture and using a quantitative approach? Which do you think is better suited to analyze organizational culture?

Support your position using citations and references. You may want to take a look at the attachment:

Required Reference

 https://clas.uiowa.edu/history/teaching-and-writing-center/guides/argumentation 

leadership

The paper will be on a current leader in an organisation( Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India) who has been effective in dealing with the current uncertain times. The effectiveness should be proven by external source of information(articles ,comments on social media…)

HR

HR CHALLENGE: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT ANALYSIS

Introduction

Not all human resource specialists will have to navigate situations with unions and management, but all human resource professionals need to think legally. By studying a seminal case between management and the union, National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp., 1963, you will gain background knowledge about the agency model of union membership and what the court defines as unfair labor practices. 

The habit of mind that you develop by studying and analyzing this case will serve you as you think about the legal ramifications of negotiations with employees and management on a wide range of issues.

Scenario

Your company is reviewing its approach to the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Your human resources team has been tasked with giving a presentation about the history of the NLRA that is appropriate for leaders as well as other human resource specialists in order to prepare them for ongoing discussions about the issues presented by NLRA for your company.

Your Challenge

You are a human resource specialist who has been tasked to present the key points from this case to various small groups of company leaders and other human resource specialists so that they have the background to discuss how the NLRA could impact your business.

Instructions

Based on key guidelines from the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), analyze National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp., 1963. Prepare a 4–6-slide PowerPoint presentation explaining and analyzing key elements of the case.

  1. Read the National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp., 1963case, noting the bulleted elements below.
  2. Review the IRAC strategy for analyzing cases and apply those steps in your study of this case.
  3. Prepare 4–6 PowerPoint slides that address the following: 
  • Introduction. 
    • Summary of the events leading up to the case.
  • Analyze General Motors’s position in the case. 
    • What was their position about ______? What was their rationale for their position? 
  • Analyze the union’s position in the case. 
    • What was their position about ______? What was their rationale for their position?
  • Analyze the role of the court in the case. 
    • What is the effect of the court’s decision on all organizations and unions?
  • Analyze the relationship of the case with the NLRA. 
    • Consider case assertions, evidence, and findings.
  • Evaluate the historical impact of this case on the union/management power struggle. 
    • What was the relationship before the case? Who was considered the winner in this case? How did the case affect future challenges?
  • Assess how this case changed the relationship between management and all employees at GM, and in unionized organizations in general.
  1. To support your assertions, cite specific examples from the case and from your other assigned readings. 
  2. Record your presentation using Kaltura. The presentation should not exceed 6 minutes. Or another option is to write out the script of your presentation in the presentation notes section of each PowerPoint slide.
  3. Review the HR Challenge: National Labor Relations Act Analysis Scoring Guide before submitting this assignment to ensure that you have thoroughly addressed the grading expectations of this assignment.

Submission Requirements

The deliverable for this assignment applies professional skills in Human Resources Management (HRM) to workplace situations that you will likely encounter in your day-to-day work in HRM. As part of your learning, we focus on the development of effective professional communication skills for the workplace.

  • Prepare a 4–6 slide PowerPoint presentation explaining and analyzing key elements of the case.
  • Use short phrases that are clear, comprehensible, and free of jargon for each bullet point.
  • Include no more than three bullet points per slide if possible. Include APA-formatted in-text citations where appropriate
  • Ensure your presentation is relevant to and easily understood by everyone in the audience. Remember, you will be speaking to people of all levels in the company.
  • If you include a voice-over in lieu of presenter’s notes, your recording should be no longer than six minutes.
  • Your written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Include an APA-formatted references slide at the end of the presentation, this is an additional slide at the end of the presentation, Slide 7.

Note: Your instructor may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assignment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assignment, once your work has been evaluated. Learn more about the Writing Feedback Tool on the course Tools and Resources page. 

SCORING GUIDE

Your Work will be evaluated using this criteria.

VIEW SCORING GUIDE

Competencies Measured

Competency 1: Apply legal thinking to human resource management issues in the workplace to ensure compliance. 

  • Analyze both General Motor’s and the union’s position in the NLRB case.
  • Analyze the role of the court in the NLRB v. General Motors case.
  • Analyze the relationship of a case with the NLRA.

Competency 2: Evaluate the relationship between historical perspectives and events and the alignment of human resource management and the law. 

  • Evaluate the historical impact of a case on the union/management power struggle.

Competency 3: Examine relationships between law, human resource management practices, and business activities.

  • Assess how a court decision changed the relationship between management and employees in a case, and in unionized organizations overall.

Competency 6: Communicate clearly, accurately, and professionally in the HR field. 

  • Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
  • Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.