8-2 Module Eight Program Critique

Follow Rubric Verbatim

The critique reading and rubric is attached below

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Responses

Speak In first Person

Respond to at least two of your peers’ initial posts. Make sure you choose at least one post that focuses on stakeholders that are different from yours. Include the following details in your response:

  • Identify at least one type of stakeholder that your peer did not include in their initial post, and explain why considering this stakeholder type is important.
  • Explain the risks of not involving stakeholders in program planning. If your peer has already discussed some risks in their initial post, identify at least one other risk that they did not or elaborate further on a risk that they did identify.

Discussion P W8

The musculoskeletal system is responsible for the structure of the body and the ability to have purposeful movements. Musculoskeletal injury and disease affect a large swath of the population and become increasingly prevalent in older adults. 

What are the short-term and long-term pathophysiological consequences of a fracture?

How might the fracture type influence the risk of complications and time to recovery?

Discussion 8

Stakeholders’ input in program planning helps with getting a different perspective. Stakeholders also provide ongoing feedback to improve program planning and implementation. Additionally, stakeholders are more likely to support the evaluation and act on results and recommendations if they are involved in the evaluation process.

In your initial post, include the following details:

  • Explain the influence of internal and external stakeholders in your program planning and why their inclusion is important for the planning process.
  • Describe how you would assess the nature of each stakeholder’s influence and importance.

discussion 1

 

  • Review practice agreements in your state.
  • Identify whether your state requires physician collaboration or supervision for nurse practitioners, and if so, what those requirements are.
  • Research the following:
    • How do you get certified and licensed as an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) in your state?
    • What is the application process for certification in your state?
    • What is your state’s board of nursing website?
    • How does your state define the scope of practice of a nurse practitioner?
    • What is included in your state practice agreement?
    • How do you get a DEA license?
    • Does your state have a prescription monitoring program (PMP)?
    • How does your state describe a nurse practitioner’s controlled-substance prescriptive authority, and what nurse practitioner drug schedules are nurse practitioners authorized to prescribe?

Post a summary of your findings on your state based on the questions listed above. Explain the types of regulations that exist and the barriers that may impact nurse practitioner independent practice in your state. Be specific. Also, describe what surprised you from your research.

Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

Texas 

Biological Basis and Ethical/Legal Considerations of Psychotherapy

Post an explanation of whether psychotherapy has a biological basis. Explain how culture, religion, and socioeconomics might influence one’s perspective on the value of psychotherapy treatments. Describe how legal and ethical considerations for group and family therapy differ from those for individual therapy, and explain how these differences might impact your therapeutic approaches for clients in group, individual, and family therapy. Support your rationale with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. 

Female Patient Cases 5

Case 1

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG) recommends in its guideline’s aspirin 81 mg daily.

  • To which group of pregnant women do the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG) recommend in its guideline’s aspirin 81 mg daily? Explain.

Case 2

The Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based on the ACOG guidelines and the maternal and fetal complications related.

  • Discuss the Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based on the ACOG guidelines and the maternal and fetal complications related.

Case 3

Discuss three fetal screening and include:

  • Screening test name.
  • Screening test components. 
  • Gestational age to perform the test, what d. Defect (s) will be screening

Once you received your three case numbers; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case:

  1. An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach maximal health potential on individuals.
  2. Name the different family developmental stages and give examples of each one.
  3. Describe family structure and function and the relationship with health care.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources published within the last five years. 

Reflection Discussion

 Pathophysiology

Instructions:

1. Reflect on Outcome 1:

o Discuss how the course content, assignments, or activities helped you integrate nursing and related sciences (e.g., evidence-based practice, pathophysiology, or health informatics) into client care.

o Provide a specific example of how this knowledge can be applied to diverse healthcare settings, such as acute care, community health, or primary care.

2. Reflect on Outcome 2:

o Describe how this course enhanced your understanding of interdisciplinary organizational and systems leadership.

o Share an example of how you can apply this leadership knowledge to improve collaboration, care coordination, and patient outcomes in diverse healthcare environments.

3. Link to Practice:

o Explain how these outcomes align with your current or future nursing role.

o Discuss any new insights or changes in perspective regarding client care and leadership in healthcare systems.

4. Support Your Reflection:

o Include at least one scholarly source to support your reflection. Use APA format for in-text citations and the reference list.