All posts by : chebby

Speak In first Person

Respond to at least two of your peers’ initial posts. Make sure you choose at least one post that focuses on stakeholders that are different from yours. Include the following details in your response:

• Identify at least one type of stakeholder that your peer did not include in their initial post, and explain why considering this stakeholder type is important.
• Explain the risks of not involving stakeholders in program planning. If your peer has already discussed some risks in their initial post, identify at least one other risk that they did not or elaborate further on a risk that they did identify.

Stakeholders’ input in program planning helps with getting a different perspective. Stakeholders also provide ongoing feedback to improve program planning and implementation. Additionally, stakeholders are more likely to support the evaluation and act on results and recommendations if they are involved in the evaluation process.

In your initial post, include the following details:

• Explain the influence of internal and external stakeholders in your program planning and why their inclusion is important for the planning process.
• Describe how you would assess the nature of each stakeholder’s influence and importance.

Post an explanation of whether psychotherapy has a biological basis. Explain how culture, religion, and socioeconomics might influence one’s perspective on the value of psychotherapy treatments. Describe how legal and ethical considerations for group and family therapy differ from those for individual therapy, and explain how these differences might impact your therapeutic approaches for clients in group, individual, and family therapy. Support your rationale with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. 

Follow Rubric Verbatim

The critique reading and rubric is attached below

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

 pathophysiology

1. Integrate nursing and related sciences into the delivery of care to clients across diverse healthcare settings.

2. Create effective interdisciplinary organizational and systems leadership in the care of the client in diverse healthcare settings.

Instructions:

1. Reflect on Outcome 1:

o Discuss how the course content, assignments, or activities helped you integrate nursing and related sciences (e.g., evidence-based practice, pathophysiology, or health informatics) into client care.

o Provide a specific example of how this knowledge can be applied to diverse healthcare settings, such as acute care, community health, or primary care.

2. Reflect on Outcome 2:

o Describe how this course enhanced your understanding of interdisciplinary organizational and systems leadership.

o Share an example of how you can apply this leadership knowledge to improve collaboration, care coordination, and patient outcomes in diverse healthcare environments.

3. Link to Practice:

o Explain how these outcomes align with your current or future nursing role.

o Discuss any new insights or changes in perspective regarding client care and leadership in healthcare systems.

4. Support Your Reflection:

 Include at least one scholarly source to support your reflection. Use APA format for in-text citations and the reference list. 

• Find an article or webpage (do not use Wikipedia or an AI source) that lists the assumptions for correlations. Find information from the Eskandari Kootahi et al. study and determine if they were met in this study. This can count as the article related to a statistical concept this week
• You used the term “homoscedasticity.” What does this mean?
• The relationship between all of the variables was positive. What does this mean? Do both variables go up together in value? Or do both variables go down together in value? Or, as one variable goes up or down, does the other variable move in the opposite direction? Determine the direction of the effect of one of the subscales of professional values on job satisfaction and explain what this means in terms of the direction of the r-value.
• Use the values in Box 9.1 to more precisely evaluate the strength of each of the correlations between job satisfaction and professional values in this study. Give the r-values and the strength of the value.
• A complete analysis of the clinical significance of research findings is not based on the importance of the variables. Clinical significance is based on four things:
  • The strength of the relationship or difference between and among the variables.
  • Your knowledge of the importance of the professional issues relevant to the variables (as in this study) or the physiological or psychological impact of an intervention on the dependent (outcome) variable (in a clinical study of the effect of an intervention on the health of patients).
  • Critical thinking related to the importance of the issue and the strength of the findings from the study.
  • Your knowledge of your setting and your patients/staff members related to the relevance and strength of the findings to your setting and patients/staff. This should include consideration of the cost and effort of instituting and maintaining a project that aims to make a change in practice or process in your setting.
• Using the four criteria above related to clinical significance and thinking of your setting and previous practice change projects in your setting, is the strength of the correlations in this study sufficiently large to justify the effort, time, and expense of implementing a project?