All posts by : chebby

Use the reference and  create program basic on it

Assignment 5: Graphs

Family tree’s and genealogy software has become more and more prevalent in recent years. From the name you might expect that a family tree would be easily represented by a tree structure, but that is not the case! A more appropriate data structure to

represent a family tree would be a type of graph. Using the description of the family that accompanies this assignment, you must represent this family using a graph structure. The graph needs to be a weighted graph. The weights will constitute the types of

relationships, I recommend using some kind mapping between numbers and strings to represent the relationships. When adding family members to the graph, this can be done programmatically for the provided family members within the description file.

Additionally, I also want there to be an interface in which a user can create a new family member and add them to the tree. This can be a simple CLI where the user provides a name, gender, and age to create a person. Then another simple CLI where they select

which member of the family they want the original relationship to be with and what kind of relationship it should be. Finally, they can edit the family member using another CLI and selecting the family member they wish to edit, the operation they wish to

perform (edit name, edit age, edit relationship), and then add new relationship between family members which can call a function that you create in order to add the original relationship. Remember the DRY philosophy, where code can be modularized or made

into a function, it should be if you plan on using the logic again.

Finally, I want you to make data assertions within the FamilyTree class that enforce certain “rules” that exist in a typical human family. An example would be a person should not have any kind of relationship to itself (a person can not marry themselves, a person

can not be their own brother, sister, father, mother, etc.). There should be at least 3 data assertions. These should exists as part of the family tree, not as part of the graph.

As a hint, for a successful design: I would recommend using layers of abstraction. Your graph class is the backing structure to the family tree class. Your family tree should implement methods that interface with the graph class, i.e. add_family_member() should

call the constructor to create a node and then call a function within the graph class to add a node to the graph. Then using the relationships function parameter, you can add edges to the graph between the new nodes and the existing nodes. The family tree

should be what enforces what relationships can exist through the data assertions, the graph does not care about what relationships are made between family members. Your functions that the user would interface with would be greatly reduced compared to the

total number of methods within the classes themselves. The user should be able to add, remove, and modify family members and that’s about it. Therefore those should be your function calls.

Submission Goals

(120 pts.) Create a FamilyTree class that will represent a family tree for a given family.

The class should contain several types of relationships that commonly happen within a family (siblings, marriage, offspring, etc.)

(40 pts.) Programmatically add the family members to the graph as described by the accompanying family description file.

(40 pts.) Give data assertions to the FamilyTree class to enforce restrictions for basic family structure (at least 3); i.e A person can not marry themselves.

(40 pts.) Provide a simple CLI the enables users to add, remove, and edit family members.

* Note that there is a total of 240 points on the table here. The assignment is only worth 200 points. You have 40 points of optional goals.

Your

Consider the mean of a cluster of objects from a binary transaction data set. What are the minimum and maximum values of the components of the mean? What is the interpretation of components of the cluster mean? Which components most accurately characterize the objects in the cluster?

Please ensure to use APA7 for your references and citations as you support your initial post.

Initial posts are to be 250 words minimum and are due by Thursday.

Replies (2) are 150 words minimum and are due by Sunday.

Murder Case

Preamble

An organization system administrator was labeled as the key suspect in a homicide case. The accused claimed that he was at work at the time of the murder. 

Police Intervention

The police asked his employer to help them verify his alibi. Unpredictably, the same organization, occasionally trained law enforcement personnel to investigate computer crimes and was eager to help in the investigation. 

Collaborative Strength: 

The organization worked with police to assemble an investigative team, seized the suspect computers in his office and residence, and backup tapes on a file server managed by his employer. All of these evidence were stored in a room to where only members of the team had access. 

Harsh Situation

At the initial stages, the operation appeared reasonably well documented, but the reconstruction process was a disaster. The investigators made so many omissions and mistakes that one computer expert when reading the investigator’s logs, suggested that the fundamental mistake was that the investigators locked all of the smart people out of the room. The investigators, in this case, were unaware of the situation and unwilling to admit the slip-up.

As a result of the investigators’ omissions and mistakes, the suspect’s alibi could not work together. Digital evidence to support the suspect’s alibi was identify later but not by the investigators. If the investigators had sought expert assistance to deal with a large amount of digital evidence, they might have quickly confirmed the suspect’s alibi rather than putting him through years of investigation and leaving the murderer to go free.

Lesson Learned

• The case amplifies forensic investigators’ requirements to obtain fundamental knowledge of computers, compatible operating systems, and application software programs.
• Forewarning forensic investigators to seek the assistance of the system administrator during the criminal investigation. 

Scenario 

• You have been retained as a Deputy Technology officer at the University and charged with the responsibility of developing an Acceptable User Policy for the department of computer science based on this murder case.
• Question 1
• Use the AUP to amplify the advantages and disadvantages of investigators’ quarterly training on most currently used operating systems such as Microsoft Windows, Macintosh, UNIX, Linux, Sun System, and more. 

Scenario 2

• The investigators, in this case, were unaware of the situation and unwilling to admit the slip-up. As a result of such omissions and mistakes, the suspect’s alibi could not work together. Digital evidence to support the suspect’s alibi was identify later but not by the investigators. If the investigators had sought expert assistance to deal with a large amount of digital evidence, they might have quickly confirmed the suspect’s alibi rather than putting him through years of investigation and leaving the murderer to go free.
• Question 2 “Investigators allowed the Murderer to go free.”

2:1. Defend the impasse of the investigator’s unwillingness to admit the slip-up?

2:2 Use the Acceptable User Policy to amplify why the murderer was allowed to go free and penalties for violations.

USE The Following attached file, called Technology Acceptable User Plolycy

1. Discuss the key components of human resource management. Pick at least four concepts from chapter nine and describe how these concepts interrelate to individual performance on a team.
2. Review table 9.2 and select one of the dimensions listed, note why it was chosen and how you relate to this behavior. If you have a personal experience, please share.
3. How do leaders select the best talent? What are some tools they can use to select the best-talent?

Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the initial post.

Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the following:

• Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
• Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful information
• Answer a question posted by another student in detail
• Share an applicable personal experience
• Provide an outside source
• Make an argument

At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use APA references and in-text citations.

Chapter 7 – study questions 1-10, Exercise 2 ( from Information Systems for Business and Beyond textbook)

Chapter 8- study questions 1-10, Exercise 2 ( from Information Systems for Business and Beyond textbook)

The above assignments should be submitted in a single word document.

 Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of  how the knowledge, skills, or theories in this course could be applied,  in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not  currently working, share times when you have or could observe these  theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in  your field of study.  

 Do a bit of research on the hearsay rule in legal proceedings. In your own words, explain the hearsay rule and describe how it relates to the concept of an expert witness. 

 Discussion: Should be between 250-to-300 words. 

DUE DATE: Saturday End of Day USA time (3 days from now)

Reply: I need 2 replies. Reply is nothing but just additional 100-150 words on same topic but as a different paragraph. (I won’t send any replies to you and then you send info on that. NO) 

DUE DATE: Saturday End of Day USA time (6 days from now)

Topic: 

From your research, discuss whether or not your organization has ISO 27001 certification. Outside of overall protection from cyber-attacks, describe, in detail, some other benefits your organization will achieve in obtaining this certification. If your company does not have this certification, how can they go about obtaining it?

Present your discussion post as if you were presenting to senior leaders of your company.

Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least TWO of the following:

1) What type of device or system did you select to conduct your forensics investigation?

2) What tool did you use for the data capture? 

3) What did you learn from the experience?

· No Plagiarism 

· APA Format required

· Each Answer Should be 350 words without References.

!!! NEED 2 ANSWERS FOR ABOVE QUESTIONS WITH 0% PLAGIARISM!!!!

!!! One Answer using FTK IMAGER LITE Tool !!! 

!!! Second Answer using Autopsy Tool !!!