All posts by : chebby

Some of the revisions requires:

1. APA Horizontal List – In running text, a series of items is designated by letters in parentheses: (a) first item, (b) second item, and (c) third item. the following three principles will be adhered to (a) respect for persons, (b) the respect for justice, and (c) the respect for beneficence.

2. Citations where needed and if appropriate. 

3. On page 5: “You have to connect this sentence with the previous one.  Indicate how the digitization relates to gathering data.  If that comes in the following sentences, perhaps rearrange the order of the sentences so readers are not confused.”

4. I am not sure how to address this question/comment “Should these two, last sentences be in the opposing argument, or the rebuttal?” on Pg 6

5. On Pg 10. I am not sure how to address the comment/feedback “Confused – already wrote lastly. Now I’m not sure of the order or to what thirdly is referring to.”

6. On Pg. 11, can you help fix his concern “Confused – Does this relate to the “Thirdly” in the previous paragraph? I think additional / different headings relating to your Intro will help guide the reader as to the layout of this section, as well as the flow.”

7. “Let’s stop here.  You should apply the preceding notes to the opposing section, but I’d like to see a revision of the Pro position section before moving forward. 

Look at your headings to help guide the reader.  This will reduce redundancy as well, as each sub-topic will have its specific place in the section.”

Organization of Content Main ideas arranged effectively (5) Level 1 Heading – Support Thesis using current academic articles and books and points of view/ or Describe subject & bioethical relevance using current academic articles (15) Argument well supported with references, ethical theory and principals Supporting argument 1 theory, 3 principles/ (15) Level 1 Heading – Opposing position supported by references, ethical theory and principals opposing argument 1 theory and 2 principles (15) The Arguments cannot use the same theory or principles Level 1 Heading – Flaws with either of the supporting/opposing arguments (5) (does not need to be both) Level 1 Heading – Faith Integration (10) Level 1 Heading – Value to Nursing using Standards of Practice/Code of Ethics/Social Policy Statement Integration & Clinical practice application (15) Stuff you need to integrate throughout: Supporting Material Quantity of resources (2) Variety of resources (2) Multidisciplinary resources (1) You must include the Annotated Bibliography & Reference page to obtain points (1) PLEASE let me know if you have any questions or concerns. please

Video Paper Requirements 40 points (select ONE movie and answer all the questions and other information you research to support your answers) The paper must be in APA format.

Personality Disorders

Select one of the following movies and answer the discussion questions that

follow in APA format report.

 Girl Interrupted (1999 Drama; Angelina Jolie, Winona Ryder,

Whoopie Goldberg)

 Fatal Attraction (1987 Thriller/Drama; Glenn Close, Michael

Douglas)

 Natural Born Killers (1994 Thriller/Drama; Woody Harrelson,

Juliette Lewis)

 American Psycho (1999 Drama/Suspense; Christian Bale)

Must answer the following questions in your APA formatted paper.

• Identify the character and the psychological disorder they display.
• Did the movie accurately portray the symptoms of the disorder? Was this an accurate clinical picture? Explain in detail and provide examples from the movie.
• Discuss any inaccuracies and misconceptions perpetrated of the disorder in the Movie. If the disorder was misrepresented explain how this could be misleading to a typical movie-goer?
• How is a personality disorder different from an Axis 1 disorder?

Quantitative and qualitative techniques are the main approaches used to evaluate evidence in nursing research (Liddle, Williamson & Irwig, 2016). Quantitative technique entails assessment of data and comparison of various measures used in the research study. Metrics applied in quantitative method of evidence evaluation include standard deviation, mean or average, as well as other statistical parameters. In addition, quantitative criteria is a measurable formal tool used for predicting, and ensures objectivity of both the results and applied variables.

Conceptual framework in respect to qualitative methods of evaluating evidence involve assessment of the process, meanings, experiences, and perceptions that study subjects including patients with reference to a particular variable under evaluation (Jake-Schoffman, Silfee, Waring, Boudreaux, Sadasivam, Mullen & Pagoto, 2017). However, qualitative approach is not used in measurable parameters. Nevertheless, in order to analyze the relevance of evidence, interpretation we use of emphatic comprehensions. The above implies that the findings and variables relies on the context of research study.

References

Liddle J, Williamson, M, & Irwig, L. (2016). Method for evaluating research and guideline evidence. Sydney: NSW Health Department.

Jake-Schoffman, D. E., Silfee, V. J., Waring, M. E., Boudreaux, E. D., Sadasivam, R. S., Mullen, S. P. … & Pagoto, S. L. (2017). Methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercial mobile health apps. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(12), e190.

REPLY2

In conducting a research, the researcher often needs evidence from a variety of articles, journals, and/or other studies to direct, guide, and support his or her research. However, it is not every evidence that the researcher finds online, in journals, or in the library that can provide valuable evidence in research. In other words, evidence must be reliable and valid before it can be used in research, and must take the study’s methodology, as well as other important factors into consideration (East Carolina University Libraries, 2020).

Two different methods for evaluating evidence would include criteria pertaining to publication characteristics and criteria pertaining to study design and relevance to the study and variables of interest (Treadwell et al, 2011). Evaluating evidence through its publication characteristics involves determining the source or evidence is peer-reviewed or whether it is a practice-based publication that publishes expert opinions about a specific issue. Another publication characteristic that must be considered when evaluating research evidence is the year of publication. Evidence published not more than five years ago are considered more appropriate than older evidence. Lastly, language of publication should also be considered when evaluating research evidence because of translation problems. On the other hand, evaluating evidence through the study design and study relevance criteria involves determining the kinds of research methodology used in the evidence and the relevance of such evidence to your own study or in explaining your variables of interest, and the applicability of such evidence to nursing practice. The hierarchy of research designs and levels of scientific evidence suggests that Meta- Analysis Systematic Reviews and Randomized Controlled Trials provide a more reliable and valid evidence in nursing research (Bowen and Forrest, 2017).

                                                                                    References

Bowen, D. M., & Forrest, J. L. (2017). Translating Research for Evidence-Based Practice. Access, 10–14.

East Carolina University Libraries. (2020). Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing: Evaluating the Evidence. Available from: https://libguides.ecu.edu/c.php?g=17486&p=97640

Treadwell, J. R., Singh, S., Talati, R., McPheeters, M. L., Reston, J. T. (2011). A Framework for “Best Evidence” Approaches in Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56653/

Instructions: One page, APA format, At least one page. At least 1 reference (Must be within 5 years). Zero plagiarism

Many theorists in different disciplines have used terms such as the edge of chaos or the onset of chaos (Booth, Zwar, & Harris, 2010; Lawler, Thye, & Yoon, 2015) to describe the boundary between complexity and chaos in which self-adjusting parameters become effective in complex adaptive systems. What application might that have for you as a DNP leader in a complex healthcare system?

 This week’s discussion will be focused on a topic that is very relevant to today’s health care environment.  We will be discussing the additional health care costs that need to be budgeted for as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

For your original post:

1. Find an article from a credible news source (New York Times, Chicago Tribune, etc.) or from a professional journal or association (HFMA, ACHE, etc.) that discusses the impact of COVID-19 on the budget of a particular health care organization or the health care industry in general.  Be sure to provide a reference citation for your article.
2. Tell us how COVID-19 impacted the budget of the health care organization(s) discussed in the article.
3. If you were the manager of the type of organization that you mentioned in question #2, do you think that you would be best off using a static budget or a flexible budget? Why?

Barbara was recently hired as a regional manager for the Urgent Care Clinic Organization (UCCO). One of her first tasks is to compile a strategic plan for the executive committee to review. The overall goal of the strategic plan is to identify specific actionable items that can better position the clinic organization.

For this assignment on UCCO, complete a minimum 2-page summary to explain why the organization should devote time to planning and why a strategic plan is needed.

Visit the Rasmussen online Library and search for a minimum of 4 articles covering the topics of strategic planning and healthcare management. Conduct academic research using the library’s databases, like:

• Discovery
• Business Source Complete via EBSCO
• Business via ProQuest
• What can a healthcare organization accomplish with the strategic planning process?
• What would you recommend as areas of focus for Barbara’s strategic plan?
• Discuss how Barbara can achieve a balance between historical and current topics in healthcare?
  • How should she apply them for her strategic plan?
• What type(s) of primary and secondary research would you recommend Barbara conduct? What are the benefits? Explain.

Remember to integrate citations accurately and appropriately for all resource types; use attribution (credit) as a method to avoid plagiarism. Use NoodleTools to document your sources and to complete your APA formatted reference page and in-text citations.

Apa format instructions are attached bellow 

1 paragraph. NO plagiarism please provided TurnItIn document. NO references older than 5 years 

Page 1: 

Discussion Question 1—Please write 4 paragraphs with each paragraph containing 50-60 words.

Page 2: 

Discussion Question 2—Please write 4 paragraphs with each paragraph containing 50-60 words.

Page 3: 

Discussion Question 4—Please write 4 paragraphs with each paragraph containing 50-60 words.

Page 4: 

Discussion Question 5—Please write 4 paragraphs with each paragraph containing 50-60 words.

Page 5: 

Discussion Question 6—Please write 4 paragraphs with each paragraph containing 50-60 words.

Link for the textbook:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Lho7gBgscbBQ1CFC16v6zMPSPHm2iDDV/view

• Incorporate professional values, attitudes, and expectations regarding ageism when caring for the older adult.
• Outline the importance of advocating for older adults in management of their care.

Your supervisor provided some valuable feedback in response to your outline! They are excited to see the PowerPoint slideshow you are creating for your topic’s in-service training. Having developed a number of presentations for in-services, your supervisor offered the following advice:

“When developing a slideshow, it’s important to be mindful of how you layout your content. For an in-service presentation, the slides should present key points, be arranged logically, without extraneous information contributing to a cluttered look. The audience should get a lot of the content from listening to what you say, not just from reading the slides. Using the Speaker Notes feature in PowerPoint is a great way to include relevant details that you want to provide without overloading the slides.”

Your supervisor wants you to work from your outline and prepare a visually appealing PowerPoint slideshow for the in-service presentation. They said it should:

1. Have a title slide.
2. Contain 6-10 content slides pertaining to the important content areas for your presentation topic.
3. Use the Speaker Notes feature in PowerPoint to reduce the amount of text that appears on the slides. (The Speaker Notes will contain the text that will guide what you say while presenting the slides.)
4. Be written using proper spelling/grammar.
5. Cite at least 2 credible references and present the sources in APA format on a References slide.

For information about creating PowerPoint presentations or adding Speaker Notes, consult the resources below.

• Writing Guide: PowerPoints
• PowerPoint FAQ
• PowerPoint & APA: citing sources and creating reference lists in PPT presentations
• How do I add Speaker Notes to my PowerPoint presentation slides?