Explore conflict management principles and professional integrity through. GROUP PROJECT

Purpose:

  • Explore conflict management principles and professional integrity through review of healthcare personnel conflict management review.
  • This conflict management assignment gives you the opportunity to review common conflict scenarios in clinical practice, and reflect on appropriate resolution strategies.  This gives you a review of an evidence based approach to a training conflict management in healthcare settings.
  • Critically access conflict management as it relates to team building in clinical practice

Description:

Students will reference the conflict case management study from the nursing literature. Students will develop a summary and reflection consensus of strategies used to resolve the case review. Support your summary using a minimum of three academically credible sources in addition to the source provided.

Please retrieve and read the following Journal article from the Library.

Forbat, L., Simons, J., Sayer, C., Davies, M., Barclay, S (2017). Training pediatric healthcare staff in recognizing, understanding and managing conflict with patients and families: findings from a survey on immediate 6-month impact. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 102 (3): 250.

Directions:

Students are expected to:

  1. Create a  slide PowerPoint presentation not including the title slide or reference slide addressing the following:
  2. Create a brief and concise overview of the case study within the PowerPoint slides;
  3. Reference a minimum of three academically credible sources in addition to the source provided;

MY PART  : Overview of case study

Provides a concise overview of the case study, 

explaining specific conflict resolution strategies applicable to case study reviewed.

Assessment

Discussion question

Head and neck
Oropharynx
Eye and the visual system 

 As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. Support your work, using your course lectures and textbook readings. 

A 50-year-old woman is admitted with chief complaints of headache and decreased range of motion in her neck. She also complains of vertigo, hearing loss in one ear, profuse sweating, and uncontrollable eye movements. Her past medical history indicates that she was in a motor vehicle accident three days before her admission.

  • What are the possible causes of these symptoms?
  • What specific diagnostic testing would you recommend? Why?
  • What conditions should be ruled out? Why?
  • How would you distinguish between these conditions?

Relationship in writing

 

For your final essay, you will need to be reflective. You will be allowed to use first-person pronouns for this assignment. You will need to create a structured paper in 750 words that describes your relationship with writing before the class, during the class, and now at the end of the class. How did you feel about writing before our semester together? Has your viewpoint changed at all? What did you learn? What do you hope to learn in 102? What do you wish we had learned together in 101? Really analyze how you feel about writing and language and how this class has affected you. 

Requirements:

  • APA formatting
    • cover page
    • no abstract required
    • Times New Roman, 12 point font
    • double spacing
    • no reference page required
  • at least 750 words
  • no outside sources are needed for this assignment, so there should be NO PLAGIARISM
  • late work is not accepted
  • must submit through Canvas, not email or Google drive share

Review of Current Healthcare Issues

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:

1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM

2). ATLEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS

3). PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED RUBRIC DETAILS. 

Thank you.  

If you were to ask 10 people what they believe to be the most significant issue facing healthcare today, you might get 10 different answers. Escalating costs? Regulation? Technology disruption?

These and many other topics are worthy of discussion. Not surprisingly, much has been said in the research, within the profession, and in the news about these topics. Whether they are issues of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there is no shortage of changes to be addressed.

In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and select one current national healthcare issue/stressor to focus on.
  • Reflect on the current national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and think about how this issue/stressor may be addressed in your work setting.

Community Health Preparedness

 

Assignment:

  • Create a PowerPoint with the intended audience to be a community health department.
  • Focus on a real or fictional disaster that has or could affect your area. For example, if you live on the Florida coast you might choose potential hurricane.  
  • Discuss the role of the Community Health Nurse in each stage of disaster. You should include a few slides on each stage of disaster: preparedness, response, recovery with specific activities and resources that the public health nurse would use in each stage.
  • Identify other agencies that might be involved.   

The assignment should be submitted in PowerPoint format, with at least 10 content slides (in addition to a title slide and reference slide) and include at least two scholarly sources other than provided materials.

W5 DQ ANP 650

  

Instructions for Answer to 2 Question

1- After Each DQ (question), write down references

2- 300 minimum words for every DQ, you can go up to 800 words but answer should be complete.

3- 2-3 Peer Reviewed/ scholarly references for each question

4- References should be within 4 years

5- I am in acute care nurse practitioner program.

6- The response to the DQ is expected to be a minimum of 300 words. A minimum of two peer reviewed/ scholarly  resources are expected. These need to be appropriate for a clinical professional to guide decisions about patient care. If a textbook is used for one of these responses, the other needs to be journal or professional-level website. The references need to be correctly formatted, as do the citations for those references.  “ Question words” don’t count towards 300 minimum count”

intro to nursing-communication

In this assignment, you will discuss concepts related to the importance of communication and related concepts in the profession of nursing.  Follow the instructions below to complete your assignment:

  • Introduce of the concept of communication with a purpose statement
  • Identify and describe the phases of the nurse-patient relationship
  • Evaluate effective and ineffective communication techniques
  • Identify a strategy or strategies to becoming a successful communicator in nursing.
  • Research this topic and integrate a current research article (within the past 5 years).
  • Use scholarly APA format including title and reference page.
  • Use correct grammar with clear and organized writing (do not use first person). 
  • Your assignment should be approximately 3-5 pages in length.

Quality Improvement Proposal

Identify a quality improvement opportunity in your organization or practice. In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, describe the problem or issue and propose a quality improvement initiative based on evidence-based practice. Apply “The Road to Evidence-Based Practice” process, illustrated in Chapter 4 of your textbook, to create your proposal.

Include the following:

  1. Provide an overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs.
  2. Explain why a quality improvement initiative is needed in this area and the expected outcome.
  3. Discuss how the results of previous research demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years, not included in the course materials or textbook, that establish evidence in support of the quality improvement proposed.
  4. Discuss steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative. Provide evidence and rationale to support your answer.
  5. Explain how the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated to determine whether there was improvement.
  6. Support your explanation by identifying the variables, hypothesis test, and statistical test that you would need to prove that the quality improvement initiative succeeded.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

Assessment 6: 6030

  • Submit your 20–25-page final capstone project that synthesizes the work you completed in the previous four assessments

    Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

  • Assessment Instructions
  • Instructions
    Note: The assessments in this course are sequenced in such a way as to help you build specific skills that you will use throughout your program. Complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
    For your final capstone project submission you will synthesize the work you completed in the previous four assessments. Please make sure that you have made relevant revisions as suggested by your instructor, as well as relevant additions that you uncovered during your practicum experience. The only brand-new content that you will need to create for this assessment is an Abstract and an Introduction.
    This final submission will be graded using the seven program outcomes (POs) for the Master’s of Science in Nursing program. As a reminder they are:

    1. Lead organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
    2. Evaluate the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making.
    3. Apply quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes.
    4. Design patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes.
    5. Integrate interprofessional care to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
    6. Evaluate the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
    7. Defend health policy that improves the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
    8. In addition, you will be assessed on how well you incorporated the feedback you received from your instructor on your previous work in this course via the following criterion:
    • Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.
    • You will also be assessed on the completion of hours toward your practicum experience.
    • Demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience.
    • See the scoring guide for specific grading criteria related to these requirements.
      Please carefully review the outline below to see which parts of the final submission will align to which program outcomes. (Note: The bullet points in the outline correspond to the grading criteria from your previous assessments. It may be worth putting in some extra revisions on the material related to criteria on which you did not previously score as well as you would have liked. You may also wish to read the Guiding Questions: Final Project Submission document to better understand how each aspect of your submission will be assessed.) It is important to remember that if you do a quality job addressing the points below, you will meet all of the program outcomes. The alignment is provided for transparency, but do not become preoccupied with how each point will feed into the scoring guide.
      Abstract
    • Summarize the purpose, approach, and any relevant findings of the final capstone project submission (PO #1).
    • Introduction
    • Summarize your need, target population, and setting (PO #1).
    • Provide a high-level overview of your intervention plan (PO #4).
    • Justify the importance of your need and intervention plan (PO #1).
    • Provide a high-level overview of your implementation plan (PO #4).
    • Provide a high-level over view of your evaluation plan (PO #4).
    • Reminder: these instructions are an outline. Your heading for this this section should be Problem Statement and not Part 1: Problem Statement.
      Part 1: Problem Statement
      Need Statement
    • Analyze a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education or management need (PO #1).
    • Population and Setting
    • Describe a target population and setting in which an identified need will be addressed (PO #4).
    • Intervention Overview
    • Explain an overview of one or more interventions that would help address an identified need within a target population and setting (PO #3).
    • Comparison of Approaches
    • Analyze potential interprofessional alternatives to an initial intervention with regard to their possibilities to meet the needs of the project, population, and setting. (PO #5).
    • Initial Outcome Draft
    • Define an outcome that identifies the purpose and intended accomplishments of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education or management need (PO #4).
    • Time Estimate
    • Propose a rough time frame for the development and implementation of an intervention to address and identified need (PO #1).
    • Part 2: Literature Review
    • Analyze current evidence to validate an identified need and its appropriateness within the target population and setting (PO #2).
    • Evaluate and synthesize resources from diverse sources illustrating existing health policy that could impact the approach taken to address an identified need (PO #7).
    • PART 3: INTERVENTION PLAN
      Intervention Plan Components
    • Define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need (PO #4).
    • Explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components (PO #4).
    • Theoretical Foundations
    • Evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan (PO #6).
    • Justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices (PO #2).
    • Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
    • Analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan (PO #7).
    • Ethical and Legal Implications
    • Analyze relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan (PO #1).
    • Part 4: Implementation Plan
      Management and Leadership
    • Propose strategies for leading, managing, and implementing professional nursing practices to ensure interprofessional collaboration during the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #5).
    • Analyze the implications of change associated with proposed strategies for improving the quality and experience of care while controlling costs (PO #1).
    • Delivery and Technology
    • Propose appropriate delivery methods to implement an intervention which will improve the quality of the project (PO #3).
    • Evaluate the current and emerging technological options related to the proposed delivery methods (PO #6).
    • Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
    • Analyze stakeholders, regulatory implications, and potential support that could impact the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #5).
    • Propose existing or new policy considerations that would support the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #7).
    • Timeline
    • Propose a timeline to implement an intervention plan with reference to specific factors that influence the timing of implementation (PO #1).
    • Part 5: Evaluation of Plan
    • Define the outcomes that are the goal of an intervention plan (PO #4).
    • Create an evaluation plan to determine the impact of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need (PO #3).
    • Part 6: Discussion
      Advocacy
    • Analyze the nurse’s role in leading change and driving improvements in the quality and experience of care (PO #1).
    • Explain how the intervention plan affects nursing and interprofessional collaboration, and how the health care field gains from the plan (PO #5).
    • Future Steps
    • Explain how the current project could be improved upon to create a bigger impact in the target population as well as to take advantage of emerging technology and care models to improve outcomes and safety (PO #6).
    • Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement
    • Reflect on how the project has impacted your ability to lead change in personal practice and future leadership positions (PO #1).
    • Reflect on the ways in which the completed intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans can be transferred into your personal practice to drive quality improvement in other contexts (PO #3).
    • Address Generally Throughout
    • Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of the project as appropriate throughout the final submission (PO #2).
    • Clearly, concisely, and cohesively articulate a health care need, population, setting, stakeholders, supporting evidence, intervention, and evaluation (PO #6).
    • Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.
    • Length of submission: 20–25 pages (including references).
    • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • Number of resources: Minimum of 12–18 resources.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.