Online discussion

Part 1

Use the article below, chapters 6-8 in your textbook, and the movie (“Miss Evers’ Boys”) to help guide your answers. Most of these questions do not have a right or wrong answer. 

  • Was this study unethical in 1932?
    • Why or why not?
    • If you feel the study was ethical, was there a point when it became unethical?
    • Did the study provide valuable information?
  • How could the study have been done differently?
  • How do you think the subjects felt about their participation?
    • Did they think they were being treated unfairly?
    • Does the answer change over time (1930s, 1940s, 1950s, etc.)?
    • Should they have thought to question the MDs or Nurse Rivers?
  • What was the impact of recruiting at churches and schools on test subjects?
  • What was Nurse Rivers’ role in the project?
    • What is your opinion of her role?
  • Was Nurse Rivers negligent or did she commit malpractice?
    • Why or why not?
  • Think of a research question or study pertinent to a specific race, ethnicity, or culture.
    • How would you ensure the ethical recruitment of subjects?
  • Imagine you are the nurse in a modern-day, ethical, TSS-like study.
    • How would you use each of the five elements of cultural competence for the selected population?
  • Which modern-day, government agencies could be involved in a health-related research study?
    • How might they be involved?

Part 2

Lack of diversity in clinical trials and research has increasingly been highlighted as a problem.

  • Hypothesize one reason (whether methodological, social, ethical, or other) why a lack of diversity has been a persistent issue in clinical trials and research.
  • What is one potential solution for your hypothesized reason?

Your initial post should be at least 400 words and supported with at least one additional scholarly source.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

The post and responses are valued at 75 points. Please review post and response expectations. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets criteria.

Research Process

  1. Read an article published recently (less than 5 years) on a topic of your interest.
  2. Provide the citation and a written summary of your answers to the following questions:
    1. What is the research problem?
    2. What is the purpose statement?
    3. What were the initial hypotheses for this study?
    4. What was the study design?
    5. Where the hypotheses rejected or accepted?
    6. What was the overall conclusion of this paper?

This must be an article related to nursing

I need 250-300 words 

Community Resource

  

Assignment: Community Resource 

Assignment Overview 

In this assignment, you will conduct a discrete and respectful community observation of an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting. Locate and attend a local Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in your area. Explain to the meeting leader that you are a nursing student studying community resources. Write a two page summary of your experience describing the clientele (be sure to respect members’ anonymity), meeting, and topics. Apply your nursing knowledge to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of this particular resource.  

Assignment Details: 

Perform the following tasks: 

• Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lesson before attempting this assignment. 

• Attend a local Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in your area o Introduce yourself to the meeting leader and explain to him/her that you are a nursing student who is studying community resources. 

o Conduct your community observation and take notes if necessary. 

• Write a two-page summary of your experience o Describe the clientele (respecting members’ anonymity), meeting, and topics. o Apply your nursing knowledge to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of this particular resource. 

o Use APA format. 

Grading

  

Criteria 

Excellent (3pts) 

Good (2pts) 

Needs Improvement 

(1pt) 

Pts. 

 

Content 

-Includes   description of clientele. 

-Describes   meeting. -Evaluates quality and effectiveness using nursing knowledge. 

-Includes description of clientele. 

-Vaguely describes meeting.   -Non-specific evaluation. 

-Vague description of clientele. 

-Missing description of meeting. 

-Does not apply nursing knowledge   in evaluation. 

 

Organization 

-Well organized into separate headings. -Main points   are clearly identified. 

-Paragraphs   transition well. 

-Somewhat organized. -Main points   are clear. -Occasional issues with flow and transitions. 

-Disorganized. 

-Main points are unclear -Difficult to follow or   illogical. 

 

Spelling/grammar/ APA 

-No spelling or grammar errors. 

-APA format   is correct. 

-Appropriate   length 

-Some   spelling or grammar errors. 

-APA format is correct. 

-Appropriate length. 

-Many   spelling or grammar errors. 

-Incorrect APA format. 

-Inappropriate length. 

 

Nursing 590

n 500-750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

  1. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
  2. Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
  3. Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
  4. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
  5. Describe implications for practice and future research.

Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis

  Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.

Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.

In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.

· Identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.

· Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.

The Assignment:

Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

· Your topic of interest.

· A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

· Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template

· Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.

· Write a 3 to 4 -paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

o Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

o Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

o Identify at least three resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

Power Point

  

Topic: Healthcare Informatics Research and Innovation

• 8 slides

• 3 References within 5 years

• Include introduction, a currently emerging healthcare technology system, goals for the product, data supporting the product, healthcare settings (including education), conclusion

(Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4) (4 hours)

nur634wk7d1

 THIS IS NOTAN EASSAY IT IS AN ASSIGNMENT

Present a case study of a patient with suspected anemia. The patient may have a chief complaint of fatigue, dizziness, or failure to thrive (choose one). Include the following in the case study:

  1. Identifying data
  2. Chief complaint (CC)
  3. History of present illness (HPI)
  4. Review of systems (ROS)
  5. Pertinent medications or allergies
  6. Physical exam
  7. Screening tools
  8. Assessment, including differential diagnoses and any pitfalls of which one must be aware

Assignment: Psychotherapeutic Approaches to Group Therapy for Addiction

 When selecting a psychotherapeutic approach for a client, you must consider the unique needs and characteristics of that particular client. The same is true when selecting a psychotherapeutic approach for groups. Not every approach is appropriate for every group, and the group’s unique needs and characteristics must be considered. For this Assignment, you examine psychotherapeutic approaches to group therapy for addiction. 

 

The Assignment

In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:

  • Identify the psychotherapeutic approach that the group facilitator is using and explain why she might be using this approach.
  • Determine whether or not you would use the same psychotherapeutic approach if you were the counselor facilitating this group and justify your decision.
  • Identify an alternative approach to group therapy for addiction and explain why it is an appropriate option.
  • Support your position with evidence-based literature.

Rubric:

 

Quality of Work Submitted:

The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.–

Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.–

Excellent 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Good 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Fair 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Poor 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–

Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.–

Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Written Expression and Formatting

Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting

English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting

The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

Critique Guidelines – Part II”

 

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.