All posts by : chebby

I need help with answering questions on mindtap on imtroduction to health care. The answers are on quizzlet, l just don’ t have enough time to get it done. I will provide credentials.

Please see the attachment 

Overview: All students will read the following HPE case study related to discerning between research and non-research during program implementation. There are many blurred lines between research and evaluation, so careful consideration of research and non-research activity is essential to ensure ethical practices are carried out at the onset of the program implementation and evaluation process.

Case Study: The CDC funded 5 health departments to develop programs to provide HIV prevention and referral services to HIV-infected persons. The project objectives included increasing the proportion of HIV-infected persons who know their HIV serostatus as early as possible after infection, providing HIV prevention services to infected persons to reduce the risk of transmission to others, and assisting HIV-infected persons in accessing medical and other needed services. Grantees were encouraged to tailor their interventions to local circumstances, and the funding supported local evaluations of the effectiveness of the interventions in each site.

The grantees provided an array of services to a mix of target populations based on their location. The CDC’s perspective was that the primary intent of the program was to provide services targeted to local community needs, and the primary intent of the evaluations was to improve those services. Thus, the project was deemed to represent non-research by the CDC. However, it was anticipated that, as a secondary benefit, the projects also would provide information—or lessons learned—that might be useful elsewhere.

Although the CDC did not consider the evaluation component of the program to constitute research, some participating health departments differed in this assessment and sought institutional review board (IRB) oversight. At sites where local IRB review was invoked, implementation was delayed up to 1 year. Confusion over whether the program constituted human subjects research resulted in the loss of formative pilot data at 1 site when a local IRB determined that appropriate approvals were not in place. Also read: HIV Rates in Black Men

Assignment: After reading the case study, write a discussion that addresses the following:

· What are the potential ethical considerations in this scenario? What are the main risks for participants in the program?

· Explain the unintended consequences that may occur from the participants’ perspective if the evaluation of the program is deemed research and informed consent is obtained? How might this change impact the participants’ behaviors, attitudes, and/or trust in the program?

· What are the unintended consequences of labeling this evaluation as non-research? How might this impact the program or future programming?

· Which entity was correct in their assessment of the evaluation’s research status (i.e. was this research or non-research)?

 What is your vision for the future of nursing? How does your vision fit with the recommendations in the IOM report? What two action steps do you plan to take to promote this vision?

Submission Instructions:

• Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

1. In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
2. In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
3. In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:
   1. What is ultimate reality?
   2. What is the nature of the universe?
   3. What is a human being?
   4. What is knowledge?
   5. What is your basis of ethics?
   6. What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines,

https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2020/practicing-dignity_an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care_1e.php

https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/

https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism

https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/

Ethical Principles

Discuss and analyze the situation according to the ethical principles that you have learned in this chapter. How would the use of a different priority of ethical principles affect possible outcomes?

• A high school student with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) wishes to attend class.
• A student has confided to a school worker that her father is sexually abusing her. She does not want her mother, who is a teacher at the school, to know and does not want the nurse or the counselor or principal to discuss this with anyone

1. What other solutions are there besides EDIS?

2. How can hospital staff contribute to help increase patient satisfaction in the ED?

3. Can AIDET be a solution as well?

4. What solutions towards patient satisfaction  have already happened and were they effective? 

5. Would there be any obstacles trying to improve this?

6. What research is being done to show a rise or decline in patient satisfaction?

answer these six questions using references from either the paper uploaded about patient ssatisfaction in the ED or other scholarly sources to answer these questions at least 4 scholarly sources for all 6 questions in APA format and citation.

Scholarly Activities 

Throughout  the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in  scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional  practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending  conferences, seminars, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and  mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement  committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within  your community, or nationally.

You are required to post at least  one documented scholarly activity by the end of this course. In addition  to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to  interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.

Submit, by way  of this assignment, a summary report of the scholarly activity,  including who, what, where, when, and any relevant take-home points.  Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the  scholarly activity as well as future professional goals related to this  activity. You may use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” resource to help  guide this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the  body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text  citations and references should be presented using APA documentation  guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the  Student Success Center.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

1. Case Study, Chapter 43, Drugs Affecting Blood Pressure 50 points if all questions are answered correctlyA staff nurse has to administer medications for blood pressure to several patients in the coronary care unit. The medications include captopril, diltiazem, and nitroprusside. The medications have to be administered to three older adults. a.  What are the indications for captopril?b.  What are the therapeutic actions for diltiazem?c.  What are the most common adverse reactions for nitroprusside?d.  What are the lifespan considerations in the older adult for the use of drugs that affect blood pressure?e.  What are the nursing implementation considerations for a patient receiving nitroprusside for blood pressure?2. Case Study, Chapter 46, Antianginal Agents50 points if all questions are answered correctlyA student nurse is preparing a paper on coronary artery disease, including the risk factors and the clinical presentation. The paper must include a review of common antianginal agents: nitrates, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers. a.  What are the therapeutic actions, indications, and pharmacokinetics for nitroglycerin?b.  What are the indications and pharmacokinetics for metoprolol?c.  What are the therapeutic actions for diltiazem?d.  What are the considerations for the older adult for the use of antianginal agents?e.  What are the important teaching points for patients receiving antianginal nitrates?

I need two case studies.  Same topic different words.