This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic study materials, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2020/practicing-dignity_an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care_1e.php

 https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/incorporating-spirituality-patient-care/2015-05 

 https://thebibleproject.com/explore/sacrifice-atonement/ 

 https://www.gcumedia.com/tncc/whole-person-care/understanding/ 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNOZ7ocLD74&feature=youtu.be 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLYORLZOaZE&feature=youtu.be 

 https://thebibleproject.com/explore/the-messiah/ 

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALsluAKBZ-c&feature=youtu.be 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0BrP8bqj0c&feature=youtu.be 

Assignment: Discussion Board Week 2- Discussion of which model you prefer, due by 11:59pm (50 pts).

Discussions play an integral role in monitoring your course participation throughout the term. You should check back to the weekly discussions multiple times throughout the week to engage in the discussion with your professor and peers. Participation is only counted during the week in which this discussion is assigned. Be sure to appropriately cite any sources you use to support your responses with standard APA citations. Answer the prompt question(s) thoroughly using a minimum of 150-200 words and respond to as many of your peers as possible – note that responses of 75-100 words to 2 of your peers are required for full credit. Be sure to answer any additional questions asked by your professor in the discussion threads. Your initial post is due by Day 3 (Friday) of the current week, and follow up posts to your peers are due on Day 7 (Tuesday). 

Discussion Prompt: 

1. Please discuss/include the following in a minimum of 150-200 words for your initial post:

• Of the styles of leadership you learned about in the resources thus far in our course, choose one that you find most successful or appealing and share the following information with your peers:
  • Which style or approach did you choose and why do you think it is the most appealing to you?
  • To support your choice, share an example of a time when you or someone else used this style of leadership and it was helpful to others.

Module 4 – SLP

INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE HEALTH POLICY:
OPPORTUNITIES AND LESSONS FOR THE UNITED STATES

The World Health Organization (WHO) is instrumental in monitoring the health of people, including special populations, around the world. With input from countries, WHO establishes goals and benchmarks for health goals.

Review the background reading for this module and conduct your own research. After you have done so, write a position paper on the importance of having a global body that monitors health, helps guide international policy, and helps establish country-level benchmarks.

Be sure to cite reliable sources and utilize the reference below for setting up your paper. You must use the outline in the reference below.

Reference: Xavier University Library. (2014). How to write a position paper. Retrieved from http://www.xavier.edu/library/students/documents/position_paper.pdf

SLP Assignment Expectations

1. Limit your response to no more than 2 pages, single-spaced.
2. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your analysis.
3. Support your proposal with a minimum of 3 reliable sources. At least 2 of the sources should be peer-reviewed articles. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php
4. Please use the following resource for evaluating information found on the internet: https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content
5. You may use the following source to assist in your formatting your assignment: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.

For this Assignment, you will work with a patient with a gastrointestinal condition that you examined during the last three weeks. You will complete your second Episodic/Focused Note Template Form for this course where you will gather patient information, relevant diagnostic and treatment information, and reflect on health promotion and disease prevention in light of patient factors, such as age, ethnic group, PMH, socioeconomic, cultural background, etc. In this week’s Learning Resources, please review the Focused Note resources for guidance on writing Focused Notes.

Note: All Focused Notes must be signed, and each page must be initialed by your preceptor. When you submit your Focused Notes, you should include the complete Focused Note as a Word document and pdf/images of each page that is initialed and signed by your preceptor. You must submit your Focused Notes using SAFE ASSIGN.

Note: Electronic signatures are not accepted. If both files are not received by the due date, faculty will deduct points per the Walden Late Policies.

To prepare:

• Use the Episodic/Focused Note Template found in the Learning Resources for this week to complete this Assignment.
• Select a patient that you examined during the last three weeks based on any gastrointestinal conditions. With this patient in mind, address the following in a Focused Note:

Assignment:

• Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding her personal and medical history?
• Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment?
• Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why?
• Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.
• Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

Note: Your Focused Note Assignment must be signed by Day 7 of Week 6.

 The purpose of this paper is to provide the student with the opportunity to explore and explain verbal, non-verbal, and written communication at the highest professional level. This assignment allows for the assimilation of professional leadership competencies as a doctorally prepared practice scholar. Assignment content supports professional formation, communication, and dissemination of skills relevant to the DNP practice scholar.

This is a redo of a paper that was submitted.  Please review the teacher comments and the guidelines and questions to be answer in the following attachment.  The assignment that was submitted received a failing marks.  Please go by the rubric requirement attached for the components of each section

In a 1- to 2-page paper, address the following:

• Briefly describe how cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) are similar.
• Explain at least three differences between CBT and REBT. Include  how these differences might impact your practice as a mental health  counselor.
• Explain which version of cognitive behavioral therapy you might use  with clients and why. Support your approach with evidence-based  literature.

Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, as defined by the World Health Organization. Nationally, there is growing interest in preventing health problems and promoting behaviors that improve individual and community health. The challenge is to use what has been learned about effective strategies to prevent health adversities and to encourage the widespread and consistent practice of healthy behaviors.

Due to changing family conditions and numbers of students attending school with health problems, the traditional role of providing assessment and screening for all students has broadened to include a focus on the physical condition of younger students, as well as substance abuse, early pregnancy, and sexually transmitted disease among older students. School health encompasses a range of activities that promote and protect student health. (http://www.maine.gov/education/sh/contents/)

1. In your opinion how much responsibility should public schools take for the health of their students? 
2. Would you consider that public schools with a fairly strong and active health program are crossing over from the business of just an educator to that of a public health/health care provider? 
3. Who should pay for these additional services and programs for our children?

 My practice problem will be on:                  Under diagnosis of diabetes: cause, effect and risk factors

Download the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool and the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool located in the Student Resource Center under “Project & Practicum Resources.”

Select one of the eight practice problems that burden the overall health of the United States. Conduct a library search for two qualitative research studies addressing this problem. Appraise the two qualitative research studies using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.

After appraising and determining the Level of Evidence and Grade of Quality for your selected qualitative studies, summarize your findings on the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.

Include your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool that includes your two qualitative research studies as an attachment with your initial post. Also, include PDF versions of your selected two qualitative research studies with your initial discussion post. Our faculty team will review both your two research studies and Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.

Analyze the evidence summary of the two research studies to address the following.

• Does the research design answer the research question? Explain your rationale.
• Were the study sample participants representative? Why or why not?
• Compare and contrast the study limitations in these two studies.
• Based on this evidence summary, would you consider either or both of these qualitative research studies as support for your selected practice problem? Explain your rationale.

Write a 5 page research paper about pediatric care.

Include:

– Practical proof

– Statistics

– Data from clinical reserach

– References within the last 5 years

APA style 

2 informative speech topic ideas(not actual speeches) with outlines on both topics and  credibility statements.