A composition from English Composition. This work has to be done in MLA format, no fewer than 500 words and no more than 520. Will be evaluated in Turnitin. Due date 11/29/2020. I attached the description and some examples of the topics you can choose. 

Leading Innovation in Nursing

2 pages, double spacing, APA format. At least 2 references. Absolutely plagiarism free.

Propose a future development that affects value-based healthcare and address the following.

· What would you create, and why? What problem does this innovation solve?

· How does this innovation impact value-based healthcare?

· How will it enhance your leadership capacity?

· As a leader, explain one barrier you may have in implementing the innovation and how you could use the 5-Stage Innovation-Decision Process to overcome that barrier.

Reading:

Chism, L. A. (2019). The Doctor of Nursing Practice: A guidebook for role development and professional issues (4 th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

· Chapter 12: Shaping Your Brand: Marketing Yourself as a DNP Graduate

o Rogers’s Diffusion of Innovation Theory, p. 304

https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284155259/epubcfi/6/296%5B%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Di23_Chapter12%5D!/4/2%5Bch12%5D/2%5Bvst-image-button-215147%5D/2%400:43.4

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project,: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
• Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
• Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
• Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

• Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
• Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
• Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
• Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer-reviewed article.
• Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Question attached with grading rubric. kindly use only ACADEMIC OR SCHOLARLY PEER REVIEWED resources. Plagiarism % should be below < 5 .

Essay about covid-19 

To include intervention with evidence and citations as well as a reflective account on practice

Reply to this discussion post…

One professional journal I would opt in dissemination of my EBP in preventing urinary tract infection is Nursing Research Practice journal. This is a peer-reviewed Journal aimed at exploring the novel strategies in the field of patient care and Nursing. The Journal provides a complete overview of the topics in this field on an Open access platform. Also, journal covers different spectrum of subjects in the nursing including the health of the patients, quality of nursing care, nurse research training, etc. The journal is open and covers a large audience addressing a vast majority of problems experienced in healthcare today. That is especially important in addressing the impact of UTIs among inpatients and adult patients.

The healthcare conference I would consider in dissemination is the World Nursing and Health Care Conference. According to WorldNurse (2018), “this international conference provides a forum for nursing and clinicians, researchers and educators to share and celebrate experiences and achievements in nursing.” The conference would offer me a good opportunity to present my project—on prevention of urinary tract infection, at the universal scale and in front of the experts.

In this assignment, the student will create a detailed plan for the evidence-based practice informatics technology- Electronic health Record (EHR) being developed for his/her organization. This informatics technology project will include a workflow analysis and a visual representation of the workflow framework/mapping. For the purposes of this paper, include a task analysis, workflow map or framework, discuss risks associated with the technology and a data collection plan. Please include Introduction and Conclusion. The student will submit a 5-7-page paper in current APA format, excluding the title and reference pages and include a minimum of 5 scholarly resources published within the last 5 years.

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION BELOW

ZERO PLAGIARISM

4 FOUR REFERENCES

If you were to ask 10 people what they believe to be the most significant issue facing healthcare today, you might get 10 different answers. Escalating costs? Regulation? Technology disruption?

These and many other topics are worthy of discussion. Not surprisingly, much has been said in the research, within the profession, and in the news about these topics. Whether they are issues of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there is no shortage of changes to be addressed.

In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and select one current national healthcare issue/stressor to focus on.

Reflect on the current national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and think about how this issue/stressor may be addressed in your work setting.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Then, describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.

This is NOT a Research Project but a Quality Improvement Project 

TOPIC: Impact of Medication Administration Errors on 3-4-Year-old Leukemia Patients 

This week’s post will focus on Chapter Three. Please address the areas below in your discussion post this week. Please write at least five concise statement discussing the content in this area. Spelling and grammar will be reviewed and graded. Note: When you write the chapters, adhere to the Proposal Paper requirements.

Population and Sample Selection: This section discusses the setting, total population, project population, and project sample. The discussion of the sample includes the project terminology specific to the type of sampling for the project.

Instrumentation or Sources of Data: This section describes, in detail, all data collection instruments and sources (tests, questionnaires, interviews, databases, media, etc.); the specific instrument or source to collect data for each variable or group (quantitative project).

Validity and Reliability: This section provides specific validity statistics for quantitative instruments, identifying how they were developed, and explains how validity will be addressed during data collection approaches. This section provides specific reliability statistics for quantitative instruments, identifying how the statistics were developed, and explains how reliability will be addressed during data collection approaches.

Data Collection Procedures: Describe the step-by-step procedures used to carry out all the major steps for data collection for the project in a way that would allow another investigator to replicate the project. Can say Step 1, Step 2, Step 3…

Data Analysis Procedures: This section provides a description of how the data will be collected and organized for each variable or group; a description of the type of data to be analyzed, identifying the descriptive, inferential, or nonstatistical analyses; a description of how the raw data will be organized and prepared for analysis; and a step-by-step description of the procedures used to conduct the data analysis.

Ethical Considerations: This section discusses the potential ethical issues surrounding the DPI project, as well as how human subjects and data will be protected. It identifies how any potential ethical issues will be addressed.

Limitations: This section discusses, in detail, the limitations related to the project approach and methodology and the potential impacts on the results.