Discussion: This week we focus on the movement of traditional IT staff. To facilitate cultural assimilation, IT and non-IT must become more integrated. What are some strategies to implement to allow this type of interaction to occur?
Note: The first post should be made by Wednesday 11:59 p.m., EST. I am looking for active engagement in the discussion. Please engage early and often.
Your response should be 250-300 words. Respond to two postings provided by your classmates.
In a corporate, networked setting, should end users be allowed to install applications on their company workstations, whether the applications are on a DVD or downloaded from the Internet? Be sure to weigh security against usability.
Discuss the importance of guidelines and procedures for access control.
It must be at least 450 words and have references.
No plagiarism and no grammar mistakes and need APA format.
properly cite the references.
Describe the plain view doctrine, and why it has such a significant impact on digital forensics? What are three approaches to determining whether the doctrine applies to a specific case.
Using WORD, in you OWN WORDS, write an ORIGINAL brief essay of 300 words or more :
(1) How do you measure how Amazon has delivered value for its shareholders?
Please go through the document completely before providing the answer.
Need a paper of 2-3 pages with references on the topic mentioned in the document.
Need a presentation of 2-3 slides with references on the same topic mentioned in the document.
No Plagiarism.
Essay: Minimum 600 words
The false discovery rate (FDR) provides an error metric to measure the rate of false positives/false discoveries. This is pertinent data as we process the data set. Is there a point when you would not correct this?
In addition, please discuss the relationship between Type I and II errors. Is this relevant to the analysis?
Discussion : Minimum 300 words
In the academic workplace, there has been the push for publications in peer reviewed journals. This and the research itself heightens the University’s exposure to other universities, potential students, and others. This culture may create a systemic bias against the null hypothesis and the subsequent researchers may find themselves in a circumstance where there is a difficulty with showing the hypotheses are false.
Would the proportion of these instances increase with a decrease in sample size?
Submit Assignment
What is the assignment?
What to hand in?
What needs to be done?
Be careful…
Getting Started
import math
import unittest
def findWaterContainerPath(a, b, c):
""" DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS FUNCTION """
starting_state = (0, 0)
final_path = list()
final_path.append(starting_state)
""" THIS IS WHERE THE REAL WORK FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE """
return final_path
""" ADD ANY OTHER (HELPER) FUNCTIONS THAT ARE NEEDED HERE """
class TestWaterContainerGraphSearch(unittest.TestCase):
def testFindWaterContainerPath(self):
""" INSERT DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THIS TEST IS CHECKING """
""" IMPLEMENT YOUR FIRST TEST HERE """
pass
""" ADD MORE TESTS TO CHECK YOUR FUNCTIONS WORKS FOR OTHER VALUES """
def main():
capacity_a = input("Enter the capacity of container A: ")
capacity_b = input("Enter the capacity of container B: ")
goal_amount = input("Enter the goal quantity: ")
# ADD SOME TYPE/VALUE CHECKING FOR THE INPUTS (OR INSIDE YOUR FUNCTION)
if int(goal_amount) % math.gcd(int(capacity_a), int(capacity_b)) == 0:
path = findWaterContainerPath(int(capacity_a), int(capacity_b), int(goal_amount))
else:
print("No solution for containers with these sizes and with this final goal amount")
print(path)
# unittest_main() - run all of TestWaterContainerGraphSearch's methods (i.e. test cases)
def unittest_main():
unittest.main()
# evaluates to true if run as standalone program
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
unittest_main()Good luck!
Assignment 5 RubricAssignment 5 RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram Execution and Output30.0 to >25.0 ptsGoodProgram executes with no syntax or runtime errors and produces nearly all of the appropriate output when run through the test script (26pts – 30pts).25.0 to >10.0 ptsFairProgram executes with via the test script but does not produce all of the desired/correct output (11pts – 25pts).10.0 to >0 ptsPoorProgram does not execute via the test script without some modification and/or produces none or very little of the desired output in the test script (0pts – 10 pts).30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCode Logic and Design40.0 to >30.0 ptsGoodProgram has all required classes, variables, and methods defined (31pts – 40pts).30.0 to >10.0 ptsFairProgram has at least some but not all requisite classes, methods, or variables (11pts – 30pts).10.0 to >0 ptsPoorProgram has few or none of the classes, variables, or methods that were required (0pts – 10pts).40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoding Standards and Documentation30.0 to >20.0 ptsGoodProgram has documentation for each class, method, function and this is displayed when using Python’s help function, “help()”. Documentation should clearly explain how and why methods are implemented as is (e.g. when and how does HashTable choose to resize itself). In addition to this, for full points the code should be consistently formatted, with consistency in how methods and variables are named (21pts – 30pts).20.0 to >10.0 ptsFairProgram has some documentation and is somewhat consistent in formatting, variable/method naming, etc. However, at least one of those is missing/incorrect (11pts – 20pts).10.0 to >0 ptsPoorProgram has little to no documentation, is not structured/formatted well, and does follow a consistent approach towards naming variables/method (0pts – 5pts).30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTesting10.0 to >5.0 ptsGoodProgram tests edge cases, or scenarios that would produce unexpected results using Python’s unittest (4pts – 5pts).5.0 to >2.0 ptsFairProgram tests for some edge cases but is missing important/obvious edge cases and may not be using unittest (3pts – 4pts).2.0 to >0 ptsPoorProgram has very few or no checks for edge cases, and does not make use of unittest (0pts – 2pts).10.0 pts
Total Points: 110.0PreviousNext
Please submit a draft of your final project for review. Final submissions are due during week 15 (from the week 15 content folder)
Final Project Prompt:
The final portfolio project is a three- part activity. You will respond to three separate prompts but prepare your paper as one research paper. Be sure to include at least one UC library source per prompt, in addition to your textbook (which means you’ll have at least 4 sources cited).
Start your paper with an introductory paragraph.
Prompt 1 “Data Warehouse Architecture” (2-3 pages): Explain the major components of a data warehouse architecture, including the various forms of data transformations needed to prepare data for a data warehouse. Also, describe in your own words current key trends in data warehousing.
Prompt 2 “Big Data” (1-2 pages): Describe your understanding of big data and give an example of how you’ve seen big data used either personally or professionally. In your view, what demands is big data placing on organizations and data management technology?
Prompt 3 “Green Computing” (1-2 pages): One of our topics in Chapter 13 surrounds IT Green Computing. The need for green computing is becoming more obvious considering the amount of power needed to drive our computers, servers, routers, switches, and data centers. Discuss ways in which organizations can make their data centers “green”. In your discussion, find an example of an organization that has already implemented IT green computing strategies successfully. Discuss that organization and share your link. You can find examples in the UC Library.
Conclude your paper with a detailed conclusion section.
The paper needs to be approximately 5-8 pages long, including both a title page and a references page (for a total of 7-10 pages). Be sure to use proper APA formatting and citations to avoid plagiarism.
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
• Be approximately 5-8 pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.
• Follow APA6 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
• Support your answers with the readings from the course, the course textbook, and at least three scholarly journal articles from the UC library to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources.
• Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.