All posts by : chebby

Murder Case

Preamble

An organization system administrator was labeled as the key suspect in a homicide case. The accused claimed that he was at work at the time of the murder. 

Police Intervention

The police asked his employer to help them verify his alibi. Unpredictably, the same organization, occasionally trained law enforcement personnel to investigate computer crimes and was eager to help in the investigation. 

Collaborative Strength: 

The organization worked with police to assemble an investigative team, seized the suspect computers in his office and residence, and backup tapes on a file server managed by his employer. All of these evidence were stored in a room to where only members of the team had access. 

Harsh Situation

At the initial stages, the operation appeared reasonably well documented, but the reconstruction process was a disaster. The investigators made so many omissions and mistakes that one computer expert when reading the investigator’s logs, suggested that the fundamental mistake was that the investigators locked all of the smart people out of the room. The investigators, in this case, were unaware of the situation and unwilling to admit the slip-up.

As a result of the investigators’ omissions and mistakes, the suspect’s alibi could not work together. Digital evidence to support the suspect’s alibi was identify later but not by the investigators. If the investigators had sought expert assistance to deal with a large amount of digital evidence, they might have quickly confirmed the suspect’s alibi rather than putting him through years of investigation and leaving the murderer to go free.

Lesson Learned

• The case amplifies forensic investigators’ requirements to obtain fundamental knowledge of computers, compatible operating systems, and application software programs.
• Forewarning forensic investigators to seek the assistance of the system administrator during the criminal investigation. 

Scenario 

• You have been retained as a Deputy Technology officer at the University and charged with the responsibility of developing an Acceptable User Policy for the department of computer science based on this murder case.
• Question 1
• Use the AUP to amplify the advantages and disadvantages of investigators’ quarterly training on most currently used operating systems such as Microsoft Windows, Macintosh, UNIX, Linux, Sun System, and more. 

Scenario 2

• The investigators, in this case, were unaware of the situation and unwilling to admit the slip-up. As a result of such omissions and mistakes, the suspect’s alibi could not work together. Digital evidence to support the suspect’s alibi was identify later but not by the investigators. If the investigators had sought expert assistance to deal with a large amount of digital evidence, they might have quickly confirmed the suspect’s alibi rather than putting him through years of investigation and leaving the murderer to go free.
• Question 2 “Investigators allowed the Murderer to go free.”

2:1. Defend the impasse of the investigator’s unwillingness to admit the slip-up?

2:2 Use the Acceptable User Policy to amplify why the murderer was allowed to go free and penalties for violations.

USE The Following attached file, called Technology Acceptable User Plolycy

 The answer will be checked for plagiarism. 

1. Discuss OSINT, how it works, and its role in the realm of social engineering.
2. Why is it difficult to detect fileless malware on a traditional anti-virus tool? Explain.
3. What are the major ingredients which you would consider if you have been 
   tasked to develop an incident response (IR) plan from the scratch?
4. What is Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI)? Explain the difference between Cyber Threat Intelligence and Cyber Intelligence.
5. What is SCDA security and what are the biggest security/risk concerns of these systems?

 The answer will be checked for plagiarism.

The COSO framework of internal controls is practiced within companies around the world. The objectives of the COSO framework are closely related to its five components. For this week’s activity, please discuss these five components of the COSO framework. Be sure to include each components’ impact on each of the COSO framework objectives. What do you feel an auditor would most be concerned with during an IT audit? Lastly, discuss suggestions for integrating COSO framework compliance into a company in which you are familiar. 

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

• Be approximately 2-4 pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.

• Follow APA6 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.

• Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations,

• Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

 If you have you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes, discuss what went right during the redesign and what went wrong from your perspective. Additionally, provide a discussion on what could have been done better to minimize the risk of failure. If you have not yet been involved with a business process redesign, research a company that has recently completed one and discuss what went wrong, what went right, and how the company could have done a better job minimizing the risk of failure. 

Contingency planning is a risk mitigation process for developing back-up plans in anticipation of events (scenarios) that might disrupt ‘business as usual’. Business continuity planning is an expanded version of contingency planning that typically encompasses a more comprehensive and extended response plan for getting back to ‘business as usual’. In a well-formatted, highly-detailed research paper, address the need to contingency planning, ensuring to address the following items:

(1) Benefits of scenario events/planning.
(2) Questions to consider when implementing scenario planning.
(3) The common types of scenario planning.

paper should meet these requirements:

• Be approximately four to six pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.
• Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
• Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook.
• Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

1.  Develop a product service idea.

A. Describe the product/service including the benefits of using the product/service

B. Discuss the potential customers for this product/service

2.  Based on the nature of the product/service, recommend at least 3 possible social media to use in marketing the product/service. Describe your recommendations and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.

 Complete your full BA Report. This is the cumulative step of the project and should be a comprehensive analysis of the solution and actions you have selected.  

Project Overview

Smart goal 

Swot analysis 

Summary of In – Scope 

Raci Matrix 

Elicitation Plan   

Stakeholder Analysis  

Criteria and justification 

Risk 

Please assist with a study guide that covers the following IT topics. Instructions and rubric included in the attachment.

Journal Article with 3 pages in APA format with References at the end

1. Definition

2. Summary (150+ Words)

3. Analysis (300+ words) 

The key terms listed below and conduct a search of online Library resources to find 1 recent peer reviewed article (within the past 3 years) that closely relate to the concept. The submission must include the following information in the following format:

Key Terms:

• Ethical tactics in Negotiation 
• Deceptive Tactics in Negotiation
• Cultural influences to Negotiation
• The Golden Rule