summary paper, 1000 words

This is the link to the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.04938.pdf

After you read the paper you will summarize the paper in 1000 words.

While summarizing the paper you should be answering few questions throughout your summary.

1. What is the problem?

2. Why is it interesting and important?

3. Why is it hard? (E.g., why do naive approaches fail?)

4. Why hasn’t it been solved before? (Or, what’s wrong with previous proposed

solutions? How does this differ?)

5. What are the key components of the approach and results? Also include any

specific limitations.

6. Can you think of counterexamples for examples given?

7. Is the approach clearly described? Can you outline the steps or summarize the

approach?

8. Does the work address the problem stated earlier in the paper? How?

9. Does the approach seem objective? Clearly state how?

10. Wrap up your paper by answering What is the conclusion of the research?

Discussion

 After reading chapter 6, analyze the structure of advanced encryption standards and why it makes it so strong.

cloud computing

Research Paper:  Find peer reviewed articles in the following databases provided by the UC Library and write a 500-word paper reviewing the literature concerning one of this week’s topics, e.g. Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity and the Cloud, Service Oriented Architecture, Managing the Cloud, Migrating to the Cloud, SLA Guidelines. (100 points)

Utilize only scholarly peer reviewed articles and papers.

Must use the following databases for your research:

  • ACM Digital Library
  • IEEE/IET Electronic Library
  • SAGE Premier 

URL: https://ucumberlands.libguides.com/security

  

Submit a MS Word document, please and use APA standards and formatting. Include a Title and Reference page. Do not paste your paper into the text box.

week-3

 

This week’s journal article focuses on attribution theory and how it influences the implementation of innovation technologies.  Two types of employee attributions are noted in the article (intentionality and deceptive intentionality), please review these concepts and answer the following questions:

  1. Provide a high-level overview/ summary of the case study
  2. Note how constructive intentionality impacts innovation implementations
  3. Find another article that adds to the overall findings of the case and note how attribution-based perspective enhances successful innovation implementations.  Please be explicit and detailed in answering this question.

 

Be sure to use the Library for scholarly research. Google Scholar is also a great source for research.  Please be sure that journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the last five years.

The paper should meet the following requirements:

  • 3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
  • APA guidelines must be followed.  The paper must include a cover page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
  • A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.

The writing should be clear and concise.  Headings should be used to transition thoughts.  Don’t forget that the grade also includes the quality of writing.

COm303 Week 4 Discussion 12

  

Narrate your experience of watching the “Christian/Atheist” episode of 30 Days. Do you think all of the participants in the episode were communicating interculturally?  Why or why not? Compare your perception of Brenda to the stereotypes of atheists that the episode presents. How does Brenda reinforce or go against those stereotypes?

Discreet Logic

For each question, you will be given an argument (or a tautology) and you need to use rules of implication, rules of replacement, conditional proofs and/or indirect proofs, to prove the arguments (or tautologies) valid. Be sure to justify every line you provide with both line numbers and the applicable rule. If you can’t access the logical operation signs, just write “dot,” “wedge”, “horseshoe” or “triple bar” wherever applicable.