Discussion 4 – Leadership Style

Here is an assessment on Leadership Style. Please take this assessment and provide an analysis of the results. How does this relate to you? How does your style impact the technological tools that you will use as a leader? How would you use your style to lead your organization? 

https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/leadership-style-quiz.htm 

You will be writing three or more discussion posts per week. Your main post must be two to three substantive paragraphs (250+ total words) and include at least one APA-formatted external citation/reference.  

Your posts should be substantive, demonstrate independent thought relevant to the topic, and encourage continued discussion. Please avoid simply repeating previous posts and agreeing. Provide supporting evidence for your ideas and opinions through the use of personal or work examples, relevant articles or websites, or concepts covered in the week’s readings. 

Wk-3

  

Assignment 1

What is the relationship between Naïve Bayes and Bayesian networks? What is the process of developing a Bayesian networks model?

Refer to Chapter 5 in the attached textbook:

Sharda, R., Delen, D., Turban, E. (2020). Analytics, Data Science, & Artificial Intelligence: Systems for Decision Support 11E. ISBN: 978-0-13-519201-6. 

Requirement: 

****Separate document for each assignment.****

Minimum 300-350 words. Cover sheet, abstract, graphs, and references does not count.

Add references separately for each assignment question.

Strictly follow APA 7th Edition Format

No plagiarized content please! Attach a plagiarized report.

Check for spelling and grammar mistakes!

$5 max. Please bid if you agree.

Assignment 2:

List and briefly describe the nine-step process in conducting a neural network project.

Refer to Chapter 6 in the attached textbook:

Sharda, R., Delen, D., Turban, E. (2020). Analytics, Data Science, & Artificial Intelligence: Systems for Decision Support 11E. ISBN: 978-0-13-519201-6. 

Requirement: 

****Separate document for each assignment.****

Minimum 300-350 words. Cover sheet, abstract, graphs, and references does not count.

Add references separately for each assignment question.

Strictly follow APA 7th Edition Format

No plagiarized content please! Attach a plagiarized report.

Check for spelling and grammar mistakes!

$5 max. Please bid if you agree.

Term paper

please  read the instructions thoroughly.

My paper topic is:

Ethical Uses of Cryptology in Computers and Information Technology 

Cloud Computing Discussion 5

Discuss in 500 words or more the differences between and advantages of MAC, DAC, and RBAC. 

Use at least three sources. Do not Use Google. Include at least 3 quotes from your sources enclosed in quotation marks and cited in-line by reference to your reference list.  Example: “words you copied” (citation) These quotes should be one full sentence not altered or paraphrased. Cite your sources using APA format. Use the quotes in your paragraphs.  Stand alone quotes will not count toward the 3 required quotes.

Discussion: Introductions and Operating System Comparisons

 Need 250 words Initial Post and two replies of 70 words each. I will post the replies later. 

1-1 Discussion: Introductions and Operating System Comparisons

Before you complete this discussion, read and complete Cisco Netacad Chapter 1. Then, introduce yourself briefly and share your interests in taking this course.

Next, describe your experience with the following operating systems: Linux, Windows, OSX, iOS, and Android. (You may not have experience with all of them, but you likely have used one or more.) Compare and contrast the operating systems that you have experience with based on at least one of the following features:

  • User interface
  • Ease of use
  • Performance
  • Applications
  • Support

In your responses to your peers, try to pick those who have different experiences than you do. Consider their initial posts and describe how those features affect you in your professional and personal life. What kinds of issues have you experienced? How did you handle those issues?

Case Study 2.1

Case Study 2.1

Read “Can Technology Save Sears?” Case Study (see attached file)
Answer Questions.

Please use this strategy when you analyze a case:

  1. Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
  2. List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired.
  3. Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation. As new information is revealed, cycle back to sub steps a and b.
  4. Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)
    • Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
    • Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
    • Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
    • Select a course of action.
    • Design and implementation plan/schedule.
    • Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
  5. Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)

Writing Requirements

  • 3–5 pages in length  (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
  • APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.
  • Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.

Written Essay2

For this assignment, submit a 5-6 page paper that addresses the following questions as complete as possible.

  1. What is Information Security Governance?
  2. What are some of the common organizational roles involved in Security Governance?
  3. What documentation is associated with Security Governance?
  4. What are some of the policies use within the Information Security Governance process?
  5. What are some of the measures, metrics, and methods to ensure governance compliance?

Title page and References pages do not count towards the total.  No abstract or table of contents is required, but please observe all other aspects of the APA guidelines with regard to spacing, page number, margins, headings, fonts and reference citations

At least 4 valid references must be supplied.  Wikipedia and Techopedia are not allowed.

Emerging Threats

Threat Modeling

A new medium-sized health care facility just opened and you are hired as the CIO. The CEO is somewhat technical and has tasked you with creating a threat model. The CEO needs to decide from 3 selected models but needs your recommendation. Review this week’s readings, conduct your own research, then choose a model to recommend with proper justifications. Items to include (at a minimum) are:

  • User authentication and credentials with third-party applications
  • 3 common security risks with ratings: low, medium or high
  • Justification of your threat model (why it was chosen over the other two: compare and contrast)

You will research several threat models as it applies to the health care industry, summarize three models and choose one as a recommendation to the CEO in a summary with a model using UML Diagrams (Do not copy and paste images from the Internet). In your research paper, be sure to discuss the security risks and assign a label of low, medium or high risks and the CEO will make the determination to accept the risks or mitigate them.

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Be approximately four to six pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page. (Remember, APA is double spaced)
  • Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
  • Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources.
  • Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.