Create a discussion of at last 400 words on APA 7 format : What has nursing accomplishing so far in regard to the recommendation made by the Institute of Medicine in 2011?

READ THE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE:

Participation Requirements

The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of this week. Two scholarly sources references are required, unless stated otherwise by your professor. 

Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. 

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of DNP essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

Rigor, currency,  and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)

Disc trans wk9

Post a description of your views on whether or not digital inclusion or broad band access should be added as a key area to the social determinants of health. Be specific and provide examples that support your position. Explain how electronic health records, mobile health, patient portals, or telemedicine can impact and be impacted by the social determinants of health. Support your explanation with the required or optional resources

Moral Status: Case Analysis

This assignment will focus on introducing you to the question of human dignity and, in particular, the Christian perspective of the intrinsic worth and value of each person. You will have the opportunity to integrate this insight with scientific and philosophical approaches that inform judgements made in health care and contrast it with secular approaches to human value and worth. The logic of human rights will be made explicit as you engage with different concepts of “moral status.”

Based on your reading of the “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” (attached) and topic Resources, complete the “Moral Status: Case Analysis” (attached) document, in which you will analyze the case study in relation to the following:

  • Christian view of the nature of human persons, theory of moral status, intrinsic human value, and dignity
  • Theory or theories used by individuals in the case to determine the moral status
  • How each theory used determines or influences recommendations for action
  • Moral status theory personal response
  • Integration of knowledge in health care (theories, multiple ways of knowing, evidence) and knowledge from other disciplines inform and support current or future professional health care practices and judgements

Support your response using only Chapter 2 from the textbook Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care and the Topic 2 Resource “The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons With Profound Intellectual Disabilities.”

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Nursing Research Discussion Week 8

Qualitative Research and Evidence-Based Practice

For this week’s discussion, you will engage with the following questions to deepen your understanding of qualitative research and evidence-based practice. Please provide thorough and well-supported answers:

  1. Issues Associated with Qualitative Research and Evidence-Based Practice:
  • Identify and discuss various issues and challenges that are commonly associated with qualitative research in the context of evidence-based practice.
  • Create a comprehensive list of these issues, providing detailed explanations of each.
  • Include an analysis of how these issues can be or have been addressed in practice, citing relevant examples or strategies.
  1. Criteria for Evidence-Based Practice:
  • Define the essential criteria that must be met for a practice to be considered evidence-based.
  • Provide three to four concrete examples of practices that meet these criteria.
  • Explain how these practices adhere to the defined criteria and the impact they have on patient care and outcomes.
  • Briefly share how this course has helped you and will help you in your FUTURE advanced clinical nursing role

Additional Guidelines:

  • Use minimally 3 scholarly references [not older than 5 years] to support your answers, as appropriate.
  • Minimum 500 words
  • Post Structure:
  • Organize your answers clearly, using headings and subheadings where necessary to enhance readability.
  • Provide detailed and well-articulated responses, drawing from academic sources, course materials, and personal insights.

Weekly Clinical Experience 6

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

  • Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
  • Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
  • Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
  • What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
  • Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within 5 years. 2020-2025.