Case study Keflavik Paper


Read Case Study 3.2 

  • Present a case analysis 2500 word in length not including the cover page and reference section answering the three questions below:


  • 1. Phyllis has called you into her office to help her make sense of the contradictions in the two project evaluations. How would you explain the reasons for the divergence of opinion from one technique to the next? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each screening method?
  • 2. Choose the project that you think, based on the two analyses, Nova Western should select. Defend your choice.
  • 3. What does this case suggest to you about the use of project selection methods in organizations? How would you resolve the contradictions found in this example?
  • You are to use a minimum of 5 to 7 sources as in accordance with APA standards including in-text citations.
Tags: No tags